Case Study Arjun is an IAS officer posted as District Magistrate (DM) in a backward district. The district has recently been declared as an “Aspirational District” and is receiving special funds for education, health, and infrastructure development. During a routine review, Arjun discovers that a large portion of the education funds have been diverted by middle-level officials to construct a new VIP Guest House. The justification given is that frequent visits of ministers and senior bureaucrats require better accommodation facilities, which indirectly helps the district by attracting more attention and projects. Arjun confronts the officials, but they argue that: i. The project has political backing and halting it will upset powerful leaders. ii. The guest house is “technically within public interest.” iii. Exposing the misuse might delay other ongoing schemes due to political retaliation. At the same time, Arjun receives a complaint from local civil society groups that several schools lack even basic facilities like toilets, clean drinking water, and teachers. He realizes that continuing the misuse of funds will directly harm the education of children, worsening inequality. If he resists, he risks straining relations with political leaders, possible transfer, and jeopardizing his ability to work in the district. If he complies, the basic rights of children will be sacrificed. Questions (a) What are the ethical dilemmas faced by Arjun in this case? (b) If you were guiding young civil servants on this case, what ethical principles and leadership qualities would you emphasize for handling such dilemmas in public life? (c) Suggest the most appropriate course of action for Arjun, balancing administrative pragmatism with ethical responsibility.

You are the director of a department that has recently been engulfed in the #MeToo campaign when two of the deputy directors working under you have been publicly named as sexual predators by two women in the department. As directed by the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, you are to initiate a committee of inquiry and submit the report within 90 days. Before initiating the committee you are faced with two narratives, first, that this is not the first time both women have come forward with similar accusations; second, that you have known both the deputy directors and their families for quite some time now, and you have noticed nothing in their behaviour that says they could have been the sexual predators as alleged. Now, while the women want you to begin the inquiry process at the earliest, the deputy directors deny all charges and say that they want to pursue defamation cases against their main accusers. In all this, public pressure is against you, with the media discussing the case on a regular basis. (a) As a director of a department what will be your course of action for starting an official investigation? State the merits and demerits of whatever course of action you decide to follow. (b) Do you also agree that the sexual nature of a crime makes the crime ethically different and difficult (to handle) from other crimes? Give valid reasons to support your views.

Case Study Q. You are the Zonal Deputy Commissioner in an affluent South Delhi district. Following a tragic fire in a high-end, upscale hotel that resulted in 21 fatalities (including foreign nationals), you have been appointed as the lead officer to conduct an internal inquiry and manage the public response. Preliminary findings indicate that the hotel—originally a residential property—was converted into a commercial establishment with illegal structural additions. Multiple fire safety inspections over the last three years resulted in "Conditional Approvals," despite clear non-compliance with the National Building Code. You discover that your immediate predecessor and several junior inspectors were instrumental in "facilitating" these approvals in exchange for significant kickbacks. Furthermore, the hotel owner is a prominent businessman who is a major donor to the party currently in power. Your District Magistrate (DM) has advised you to "focus on the fire-fighting lapses" rather than the "administrative and structural failures" in your report, warning that digging too deep would create an unnecessary political storm and affect the city’s global standing. Questions: 1. Identify the ethical dilemmas inherent in this situation as a civil servant. 2. Analyse the conflict between your 'Code of Conduct' and the instructions given by your superior. 3. Evaluate the moral implications of prioritising "institutional image" over "public safety and accountability" in this context. 4. Formulate a strategic plan to address the immediate aftermath and suggest institutional reforms to prevent such incidents in the future.

Case Study You are a district collector of a drought-prone area where farmers are suffering from crop failure and debt. You have been allocated funds by the state government to provide relief measures such as food grains distribution, loan waivers and employment generation schemes. However, you find out that some local politicians and officials are involved in diverting these funds for their personal gains. They have also threatened some honest staff members who tried to expose their corruption. You have evidence against these corrupt people but you also know that they have strong political connections and influence in the area. Q. What will you do in this situation?

Case Study Ms. Leena Chatterjee is serving as a Principal Secretary (Urban Development) in a State that has committed to ambitious climate-resilient infrastructure targets. A flagship metro rail extension project—partially funded by an international development agency—has reached an advanced stage. An internal audit flags that while the project complies with existing environmental clearances, it falls short of newly issued climate-adaptation guidelines that recommend additional flood-resilience features. Incorporating these measures would significantly raise costs and delay completion by at least a year. The funding agency has informally indicated that continued financing depends on timely delivery, not retroactive compliance. At the same time, climate scientists and civil society groups warn that ignoring the updated standards could expose future commuters to serious risks. Political executives emphasise the urgency of inaugurating the project before the next election cycle, while senior bureaucrats caution that reopening approvals could trigger litigation and administrative paralysis. Questions. 1. What are the ethical issues involved in this case? 2. What options are available to Ms. Chatterjee? Evaluate the merits and demerits of each. 3. Which course of action should Ms. Chatterjee adopt to balance public interest, sustainability, and administrative responsibility? Justify your answer.

Case Study You are serving as the District Magistrate of a coastal district where a major port-led industrial corridor project has been proposed to boost exports, infrastructure and employment generation. The project has strong support from the state government and industry groups, who argue that delays could affect investment inflows and regional development. However, the project area includes ecologically sensitive coastal wetlands and fishing villages dependent on marine resources for livelihood. Environmental experts have warned that large-scale construction may increase coastal erosion, biodiversity loss and long-term disaster vulnerability in a cyclone-prone region. During consultations, local communities raise concerns regarding displacement, inadequate rehabilitation and loss of traditional livelihoods, while many unemployed youth support the project for economic opportunities. You also discover that certain environmental clearances were expedited under administrative pressure and that some officials are reluctant to formally record objections despite serious concerns. Meanwhile, media narratives have become polarised, portraying the administration either as anti-development or insensitive to environmental and social justice concerns. Questions: 1. Identify the ethical issues and conflicting values involved in the case. 2. What are the options available to you? Evaluate their merits and demerits. 3. What course of action would you adopt to balance developmental needs, environmental sustainability and social justice?

Case Study Suppose you are an officer in-charge of implementing a social service scheme to provide support to old and destitute women. An old and illiterate woman comes to you to avail the benefits of the scheme. However, she has no documents to show that she fulfils the eligibility criteria. But after meeting her and listening to her you feel that she certainly needs support. Your enquiries also show that she is really destitute and living in a pitiable condition. You are in a dilemma as to what to do. Putting her under the scheme without necessary documents would clearly be violation of rules. But denying her the support would be cruel and inhuman 1. Can you think of a rational way to resolve this dilemma? 2. Give your reasons for it.