You are the District Collector of a drought-prone area. The government has announced a relief package for the farmers, which includes waiving off their loans and providing them with free seeds and fertilizers. However, you find out that some of the local politicians and officials are misusing the funds and diverting the resources for their personal gain. They are also threatening the farmers who complain or refuse to cooperate with them. As a responsible officer, how will you deal with this situation? Explain the ethical issues involved and the course of action you will take.

Case Study You are serving as the District Magistrate of a coastal district where a major port-led industrial corridor project has been proposed to boost exports, infrastructure and employment generation. The project has strong support from the state government and industry groups, who argue that delays could affect investment inflows and regional development. However, the project area includes ecologically sensitive coastal wetlands and fishing villages dependent on marine resources for livelihood. Environmental experts have warned that large-scale construction may increase coastal erosion, biodiversity loss and long-term disaster vulnerability in a cyclone-prone region. During consultations, local communities raise concerns regarding displacement, inadequate rehabilitation and loss of traditional livelihoods, while many unemployed youth support the project for economic opportunities. You also discover that certain environmental clearances were expedited under administrative pressure and that some officials are reluctant to formally record objections despite serious concerns. Meanwhile, media narratives have become polarised, portraying the administration either as anti-development or insensitive to environmental and social justice concerns. Questions: 1. Identify the ethical issues and conflicting values involved in the case. 2. What are the options available to you? Evaluate their merits and demerits. 3. What course of action would you adopt to balance developmental needs, environmental sustainability and social justice?

Case Study In a rural region near the Ganga river basin, the local economy has increasingly become dependent on sand mining for construction purposes. The local government has issued permits for sand mining in limited areas under strict regulations. However, illegal sand mining is rampant in the region, with powerful contractors exploiting local resources and creating environmental degradation. Many contractors extract sand in excess of permitted limits and from non-designated areas, severely affecting the river's flow, local biodiversity, and nearby agricultural lands. During your inspection visit as a district official, you observe large-scale illegal sand mining activities despite the presence of regulatory bodies. Upon questioning, the workers claim they are employed by a registered contractor operating within the limits. However, you notice heavy machinery being used in restricted areas. Villagers complain that illegal mining is damaging their fields, causing erosion, and affecting water availability. Moreover, you learn that the local administration is allegedly turning a blind eye to the issue due to the involvement of influential political figures. 1. What are the stakeholders involved in this situation? 2. Bring out and discuss the ethical issues involved in the above case. 3. What steps would you take to address the situation as a district official?

You are the Managing Director of Metro Rail Corporation (MRC) of a metropolitan city and you have received orders and funding for construction of the metro track and a parking space in a densely forested area of the city with houses of few underprivileged families as well in it. For the construction, the forest has to be cleared and the families have to be moved to some other place. The locals have started a protest after knowing about the order. They are highly raged about cutting down thousands of trees and the affected families have also joined them because the forest holds emotional value for them. On the other hand, the minister who directly controls the MRC is pressuring you to start the felling process as soon as possible. You know that going against his orders will have serious repercussions. (a) What are the ethical issues involved and the options available to you in such a situation? (b) Also, suggest a course of action you would like to follow.

Case Study You are a young field athlete, proudly representing India in your debut at an international championship. While staying at the athletes' village, you accidentally enter the common restroom and see a few senior team members injecting themselves with an unidentified substance. Suspicious, you ask them about it. They explain that it's a ‘recovery booster, a performance-enhancing drug (PED) that supposedly helps with endurance and muscle repair. They further suggest that using it is common practice, especially in global competitions, and if you want to remain competitive and secure your place in the team, you should consider taking it too. Later, while contemplating whether to approach the coach, you learn from another junior athlete that the team coach is not only aware but has allegedly recommended its use, citing ‘national interest’ and ‘medal pressure.’ Questions: (a) What are the key ethical dilemmas involved in this situation? (b) What are the possible courses of action available to you in this scenario? (c) What course of action would you choose and why?