Case Study You are an IAS officer posted in a district known for its high rate of farmer suicides due to crop failures. The district has received special attention from the government, and several schemes and policies have been implemented to help the farmers. However, despite these efforts, the number of suicides has not decreased, and the situation seems to be worsening. During a routine visit to one of the affected villages, you come across a farmer who tells you that the local officials have been demanding bribes for the release of funds under the government schemes. He also tells you that the local officials have been inflating the cost of the projects and pocketing the extra money. The farmer tells you that he has already spent all his savings on his failed crops and cannot afford to pay any more bribes. You are aware that acting against the officials may result in political pressure and backlash, and it may also jeopardize your own career. However, you also know that if you do nothing, the situation will continue to deteriorate, and more lives will be lost. What would you do in this situation? How would you balance your duty to serve the people with the potential risks to your career and personal safety?

Case Study You are an officer working for the fire department in a city. One day, a massive fire breaks out in a building belonging to a coaching institute having classrooms where more than 1000 students are stranded. Also, the building lacks proper fire safety measures and adequate exits. Panic ensues as students inside the building desperately try to escape the flames and smoke, resulting in some individuals resorting to jumping off the building to save themselves. As you arrive at the scene, you are faced with the following dilemmas: (a) How do you prioritize the rescue operations, given the limited resources and time available? (b) How do you deal with the ethical and legal implications of the building owner’s negligence and violation of fire safety norms? (c) How do you handle the emotional and psychological impact of witnessing such a tragic incident on yourself and your team members?

Case Study You are the District Magistrate (DM) of a district that is home to a famous ancient temple. Every year, during a specific month, the "Maha Yatra" (Great Pilgrimage) takes place, attracting nearly 10 lakh devotees from across the country. The local economy is heavily dependent on this month-long event, with shopkeepers, hoteliers, and transport operators earning 70% of their annual income during this period. Two weeks before the Yatra is scheduled to begin, a new, highly contagious virus strain breaks out in a neighboring state. While the mortality rate is low, the transmission rate is extremely high, and it causes severe respiratory distress in the elderly. Medical experts warn that large crowds could turn into "super-spreader" events, potentially overwhelming the healthcare infrastructure. The sentiment in your district is volatile: 1. Religious Leaders: The temple trust argues that the Yatra has continued unbroken for 200 years and cancelling it would be "inauspicious". 2. Economic Stakeholders: The local Traders' Association warns of mass protests if the Yatra is cancelled, as they have taken huge loans in anticipation of the season. As you deliberate, a report arrives stating that 5 cases of the virus have already been detected in your district. If the Yatra proceeds in full force, the district hospital is projected to collapse within days. If you cancel it, you risk a law and order breakdown and economic devastation for the locals. Questions: 1. Identify the ethical issues and dilemmas involved in this case. 2. What are the options available to you in the given situation? Discuss the merits and demerits of each option. 3. What course of action would you adopt in this situation? Justify your answer with reference to ethical principles.

Pawan is pursuing MBA and shares a room with you in the private hostel. He desperately needs a job after completing his course because of educational loan and weak economic background. In his last two semesters, he couldn’t secure good grades due to serious illness. In current semester he has to secure good marks at any cost to satisfy minimum criteria for placements. Few days before the final semester exam, he comes to you and asks for money. He is stressed and nervous. He tells you about his plan to purchase semester papers to clear the exam and convinces you for the same by giving reference to his bad health, family status and his education loan. In such circumstances, would it be right to lend money to him? (a) Identify the moral dilemma faced by you. (b) Analyse your role and duties as a friend, also suggest your course of action.

Case Study You are the District Collector of a rapidly urbanizing district. A large government housing project is under construction to provide affordable homes to economically weaker sections. The project is being executed by a private contractor under a public-private partnership (PPP) model. One evening, a section of an under-construction residential block collapses, leading to the death of five workers and injuring many others. A preliminary investigation suggests that poor-quality construction materials were used. Further, it is revealed that the project approval process had several irregularities, including the violation of environmental clearance norms and unauthorized expansion beyond the sanctioned plan. The project was approved under the tenure of your predecessor, who is now a senior bureaucrat in the state government. As you begin an in-depth inquiry, you receive immense pressure from multiple stakeholders. Senior officials advise you to avoid implicating your predecessor, arguing that it could tarnish the administration's reputation. The contractor, a politically well-connected businessman, offers you a lucrative post-retirement consultancy role in exchange for diluting the report. Additionally, local political leaders, citing the urgency of providing housing to the poor, urge you to let the project continue despite the lapses. Meanwhile, workers' unions and civil society groups demand strict action against those responsible. 1. Identify the ethical dilemmas in this case and analyze them using relevant ethical theories. 2. What course of action should you take to ensure accountability while balancing the interests of all stakeholders? 3. What policy recommendations can help prevent the recurrence of such infrastructure failures?

Case Study Puneet is a young and dynamic officer serving as the Director of the State Sports Council. His mandate is to promote sports at the grassroots level, improve infrastructure, and ensure fair selection of athletes for national and international competitions. During his tenure, Puneet receives multiple complaints from young athletes and coaches about rampant favoritism and corruption in the selection process for a prestigious international sports event. Allegations suggest that several underqualified candidates were selected due to political connections and bribes , while talented athletes, especially from economically weaker backgrounds, were ignored. Upon investigation, Puneet finds strong evidence of malpractice involving senior officials, influential politicians, and sports federation members. When he raises the issue with his superiors, he is advised to “look the other way” as the individuals involved are politically powerful. Some officials warn him that exposing the issue could lead to career repercussions, frequent transfers, or administrative sidelining. Athletes and their families have intensified their protests, demanding justice and transparency, sparking mass public outrage. The issue has gained widespread media attention, putting significant pressure on the authorities to act. Meanwhile, a well-known journalist approaches Puneet, seeking insider information to expose the scandal. However, Puneet faces a dilemma: taking action against the malpractice could delay the team selection process, potentially jeopardizing the country’s participation in the prestigious event, while inaction would compromise his integrity and the principles of fairness and accountability. Questions: 1. What are the ethical dilemmas faced by Puneet in this situation? 2. Evaluate the possible courses of action Puneet can take in this scenario. Discuss the merits and consequences of each approach in light of his ethical responsibilities and the public interest. 3. What institutional and grassroots-level reforms can be implemented to prevent favoritism and corruption in sports governance and ensure fair opportunities for athletes, especially those from economically weaker backgrounds?