Amrita, a young IAS officer, has joined a government department. After working for a while in this department, she realizes that the position of women staff is subservient to male staff. The male staff does not want to take orders from senior women officers. Moreover, women are not taken on serious departmental projects and are discouraged from participating in such projects. Amrita through informal channels comes to know that even the Head of the Department is of the same mindset and believes that women should not be sent to this department. Discuss the course of action Amrita should take so that the work culture becomes conducive for women.

Case Study You are the Municipal Commissioner of a metropolitan city. During a routine audit, you discover that a high-profile urban infrastructure project, a flyover designed to ease traffic congestion in a low-income area, is being constructed using substandard materials. The contractor is a major donor to the ruling political party, and the irregularities were seemingly overlooked by senior engineers in your department. If the project continues, there is a significant risk of structural failure in the future, endangering thousands of lives. If you halt the project to initiate a formal investigation, you will face immense political pressure, potential suspension, and the stalling of a project that is already years behind schedule. Additionally, the lead engineer on the project, a senior official nearing retirement, approaches you privately, begging you to look the other way, citing that the "small" compromise was necessary to keep the project viable amid budget constraints. In this context, answer the following: 1. Identify the ethical conflicts in this scenario. 2. Evaluate the options available to you as the Municipal Commissioner. 3. What is your immediate and long-term course of action? Justify your decisions, keeping in mind the principles of administrative integrity and public safety.

Case Study As the District Magistrate of a city with a sizable transgender population, you are confronted with a growing number of public complaints about aggressive begging by some members of the transgender community at busy traffic intersections. Commuters report feeling harassed or coerced into giving money, and traffic police raise concerns about disruptions and safety hazards at junctions. Upon investigation, you find that many transgender individuals have limited access to education or employment due to deep-rooted social stigma and exclusion. Several transgender advocacy groups acknowledge the complaints but assert that, for many in the community, begging remains the only viable source of livelihood given the persistent discrimination they face in mainstream employment sectors. You are under pressure to act swiftly to restore public order and ensure road safety, but you are also mindful of the need to uphold dignity, rights, and social justice for a historically marginalized community. Questions: (a) What are the key ethical dilemmas involved in balancing public order with the rights and dignity of transgenders? How do prevailing societal attitudes shape these dilemmas? (b) What policy interventions could you consider to address both the immediate concerns and the long-term welfare of the transgender community?

Case Study You work in a government office, and due to your expertise and trustworthiness, you have been selected to serve on election duty. Your role involves ensuring a fair and transparent electoral process by overseeing the polling station operations, maintaining the voting machines, and monitoring the conduct of election officials. During the election, you observe a fellow election official who happens to be your good friend engaging in misconduct. The official is manipulating the voting process by favouring a particular political party, allowing unauthorized individuals to vote multiple times, and suppressing votes from certain demographics. You are aware that the actions of this official compromise the integrity of the election and violate the principles of fairness and impartiality. How do you balance your duty to the election process with potential personal consequences?

You are Abhishek and you went to Jodhpur to attend the wedding of your friend Neeraj. The wedding went very well and all the rituals were properly followed. At the end of the wedding, the father of the bride offered Rs 10 Lakh to Neeraj to buy a car as a dowry. Since Neeraj and his family are very progressive, they are against the practice of dowry, they denied it. They also reminded the father that under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, it is illegal to offer a dowry. But the father insisted that being a father, he has the right to give his money to his daughter and her husband. Identify the ethical dilemmas involved in the case. What suggestions will you give to your friend Neeraj in this scenario? Are legislative solutions effective to solve social issues?