Terror case: Court grants bail to activist Khurram Parvez. (See the linked source for details.)
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The Supreme Court has previously ruled in the NIA v. Sreekumar case (2020) that UAPA provisions cannot be used to stifle legitimate dissent or activism.
Mains Practice Question
Critically examine the implications of granting bail to Khurram Parvez under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
Under which act was a case filed against Khurram Parvez?
The Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) was the act under which a case was filed against Khurram Parvez, a prominent human rights activist.
Which agency had filed a case against Khurram Parvez?
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is a specialized agency dealing with national security and terrorism-related cases. Its involvement in Khurram Parvez's case highlights the complexities of anti-terror laws.