ClearMains
A resident of Nirala Estate in Greater Noida, Rachit Katyal, has moved the Supreme Court after his housing society allegedly failed to act on his request to install a private EV charger. The petition seeks implementation of the Ministry of Power's 2024 guidelines on EV charging infrastructure in housing societies. The case raises a wider question over whether India's EV owners have an enforceable right to charge their vehicles at home.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Mains Practice Question
Critically discuss the implications of housing societies blocking electric vehicle charger installations, particularly with regards to the implementation of guidelines by the Union Ministry of Power.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
Under which article of the Constitution can the Supreme Court hear petitions alleging a violation of fundamental rights?
The Supreme Court has jurisdiction under Article 32 to hear petitions alleging a violation of fundamental rights, making it the relevant provision in this context.
How many flats does Nirala Estate have?
Nirala Estate has nearly 4,000 flats, highlighting the need for adequate electric vehicle charging infrastructure in such large residential complexes.
Consider the following statements regarding Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: 1. The Union Ministry of Power has issued guidelines on EV charging infrastructure in 2024. 2. Nirala Estate has more than two charging points for its residents. 3. Rachit Katyal's Public Interest Litigation was filed before the Bombay High Court. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement-1 is incorrect because the fact list states that the Union Ministry of Power's Guidelines exist on paper but are not being implemented. Statement-2 is correct based on statement 3 in the fact list. Statement-3 is incorrect because Rachit Katyal filed a Public Interest Litigation directly before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution, not the Bombay High Court.