The Supreme Court has struck down certain provisions of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021. The judgments of the Supreme Court apply to appointments, tenure, and service conditions of tribunal members and Chairpersons. The Union Minister of Law and Justice informed the Lok Sabha about these developments.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The National Tribunals Authority Bill, 2022, was introduced in Parliament to establish a separate authority for tribunals and ensure their independence.
Prelims Practice MCQs
Under which year did the Supreme Court strike down certain provisions of The Tribunal Reforms Act?
The Supreme Court struck down certain provisions of The Tribunal Reforms Act in 2025. This judgment is a significant development in the context of tribunal reforms.
Consider the following statements regarding Tribunal Reforms Act: 1. The Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 has certain provisions struck down by the Supreme Court in its judgment dated 19.11.2025. 2. The Union Minister of Law and Justice is Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal Ji. 3. The appointments, tenure and service conditions of the members and Chairpersons of the tribunals are governed by various judgments of the Lok Sabha. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is correct as it directly mentions that certain provisions of The Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 have been struck down. Statement 2 is also correct because Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal Ji is indeed the Union Minister of Law and Justice. However, statement 3 is incorrect as it incorrectly states that the appointments, tenure and service conditions are governed by various judgments of the Lok Sabha, whereas the fact list actually mentions that they are governed by various judgments of the Supreme Court.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 has certain provisions struck down by the Supreme Court. Statement-II: This was done to ensure judicial independence and align with previous Supreme Court judgments on appointments. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-1 is correct because it directly quotes a fact from the list. Statement-2 is incorrect because there is no information in the list about why or how the provisions were struck down, and it makes an unsubstantiated claim about the purpose of the action.