The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has dismantled a major network involved in importing South-East Asian areca nuts into India by falsely declaring them as Bangladeshi origin and fraudulently availing concessional duty benefits under the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA). The investigation has revealed a potential revenue loss of more than Rs. 2,500 crore and nine persons have been arrested in connection with the case.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The SAFTA agreement is a preferential trade agreement between South Asian countries aimed at promoting trade and economic cooperation in the region.
Prelims Practice MCQs
What is the potential revenue loss uncovered by the DRI in the SAFTA agreement case?
The DRI uncovered a potential revenue loss of more than Rs. 2,500 crore due to the illegal use of the SAFTA agreement in areca imports.
Consider the following statements regarding Revenue Loss Due to SAFTA Abuse: 1. The potential revenue loss due to SAFTA abuse is estimated to be over Rs. 5,000 crore. 2. The DRI investigation has revealed a potential revenue loss of more than Rs. 2,500 crore. 3. The SAFTA agreement has resulted in a revenue loss of over Rs. 10,000 crore in the past year. How many of the above statements are correct?
The correct estimate of revenue loss is based on the fact list, which states that the investigation has revealed a potential revenue loss of more than Rs. 2,500 crore. The other two statements are either too high (Rs. 5,000 crore) or not supported by the fact list (Rs. 10,000 crore).
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The DRI investigation has led to a potential revenue loss of more than Rs. 2,500 crore. Statement-II: The revenue loss is due to the fact that areca nuts imported under SAFTA agreement are fully exempt from customs duty. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is correct as the fact list mentions a potential revenue loss of more than Rs. 2,500 crore. Statement 2 is correct as it explains why the revenue loss occurred, which is due to the fact that areca nuts imported under SAFTA agreement are fully exempt from customs duty.