The Third Annual Review Meeting of RuTAG 2.0 projects was held on 24-25 September 2026, at IIT Roorkee. The meeting aimed to review the progress of projects under RuTAG 2.0 and deliberate on technology maturity, field validation, and wider adoption. Prof. Ajay Kumar Sood, Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India, emphasized the need for RuTAG to remain focused on addressing practical and genuine challenges faced by rural communities.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Mains Practice Question
Discuss the evolution of the RuTAG initiative, highlighting its key features and objectives in addressing rural technology needs.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
Which ministry or body is responsible for RuTAG?
RuTAG is managed by the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser, which oversees its implementation and objectives.
How many RuTAG Centres are part of the RuTAG 2.0 scheme?
RuTAG 2.0 has seven RuTAG Centres, which serve as hubs for the scheme's activities and initiatives.
In which year was RuTAG formally established?
RuTAG was formally established in 2004 by the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser.
Consider the following statements regarding RuTAG 2.0: 1. RuTAG 2.0 was launched in 2020. 2. RuTAG 2.0 has 10 RuTAG Centres. 3. RuTAG 2.0 places greater emphasis on field engagement, technology validation, commercialisation, scale-up, and their wider application. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is false because RuTAG 2.0 was launched in 2023, not 2020. Statement 2 is false because RuTAG 2.0 has 7 RuTAG Centres, not 10. Statement 3 is true because RuTAG 2.0 places greater emphasis on field engagement, technology validation, commercialisation, scale-up, and their wider application.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: RuTAG 2.0 was launched by the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser (OPSA). Statement-II: RuTAG 2.0 was launched by the Ministry of Science and Technology. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is true because the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser (OPSA) is responsible for RuTAG. Statement 2 is false because there is no evidence in the fact list that the Ministry of Science and Technology was involved in the launch of RuTAG 2.0.