The rights groups say any meaningful discussion on the Aravallis will remain incomplete without the participation of rural communities, farmers, pastoralists, and experts on water resources
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Prelims Practice MCQs
A Supreme Court-appointed panel has been formed to discuss the Aravallis?
The Supreme Court has appointed a panel to discuss the Aravallis. This indicates that the court is taking an active role in addressing concerns related to the region.
Consider the following statements regarding Aravallis Panel Hearings: 1. Rights groups are calling for an overhaul in hearings by a Supreme Court-appointed panel. 2. The participation of experts on water resources is necessary for any meaningful discussion on the Aravallis. 3. The Supreme Court has appointed a panel to discuss the Aravallis only after consulting with local farmers. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is correct because it directly reflects fact #2. Statement 2 is correct because it aligns with fact #3, which emphasizes the importance of diverse perspectives in discussions about the Aravallis. Statement 3 is incorrect as there's no information provided on whether or not the Supreme Court consulted with local farmers before appointing the panel.