The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India, concluded its two-day Bihar Open Hearing and Camp sitting in Patna, hearing more than 70 cases, including bonded labour, and recommending relief to victims. The Commission interacted with representatives of NGOs and civil society organisations to strengthen coordination. More than Rs 1 crore was paid as relief to victims on NHRC recommendations.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Prelims Practice MCQs
NHRC, India concluded its two-day Bihar Open Hearing and Camp sitting in which city?
Patna is the capital city of Bihar, where the NHRC conducted its two-day hearing.
Consider the following statements regarding NHRC's Bihar Open Hearing and Camp Sitting: 1. The NHRC, India, conducted its two-day Bihar Open Hearing and Camp sitting in Patna on 8 October 2026. 2. More than 70 cases, including bonded labour, were heard in the presence of complainants, victims, and officers concerned. 3. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India, is led by Chairperson, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, who is also the Chief Minister of Bihar. How many of the above statements are correct?
The fact list supports the first two statements, as it mentions that the NHRC conducted its two-day Bihar Open Hearing and Camp sitting in Patna on 8 October 2026, and that more than 70 cases, including bonded labour, were heard. However, the third statement is false, as Justice V. Ramasubramanian is the Chairperson of the NHRC, not the Chief Minister of Bihar.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The NHRC, India, directed the Bihar DGP to provide protection and a dedicated helpline number to a woman victim. Statement-II: The NHRC, India, interacted with the representatives of NGOs, civil society organisations, and human rights defenders to strengthen coordination. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is true as it is mentioned in fact 8 that the Commission directed the Bihar DGP to provide protection and a dedicated helpline number to a woman victim. Statement 2 is true as it is mentioned in fact 4 that the Commission also interacted with the representatives of NGOs, civil society organisations, and human rights defenders to strengthen coordination. Statement 2 does not explain why Statement 1 is true, as the two statements are independent facts.