Rajya Sabha adjourned for the day; Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju says 10 hours can be allocated for discussion on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Mains Practice Question
Critically examine the implications of allocating a specific time limit for discussion on the Public Examinations Amendment Bill, 2026.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 is being discussed in which house?
The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 is being discussed in the Lok Sabha.
Consider the following statements regarding Public Examinations Amendment Bill: 1. The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 is being discussed in Rajya Sabha. 2. 10 hours can be allocated for discussion on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026. 3. Minister Kiren Rijiju is running the Lok Sabha. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 2 is correct because it directly matches fact #2. Statement 1 is incorrect because fact #1 mentions the Lok Sabha, not Rajya Sabha. Statement 3 is incorrect because fact #4 mentions Minister Kiren Rijiju running the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, not the Lok Sabha.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The Public Examinations Amendment Bill, 2026 is being discussed in Lok Sabha. Statement-II: Lok Sabha has a limited time allocation for discussion on the bill. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-1 is correct as per Fact #1. Statement-2 is also correct as per Fact #2, but it does not explain why the bill is being discussed in Lok Sabha.