The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India heard 86 cases online of alleged bonded labour in brick kilns across various districts of Haryana. Chairperson, Justice V. Ramasubramanian presided over the hearing in the presence of Joint Secretary, Shri Samir Kumar, Joint Registrar (Law), Shri Indrajeet Kumar and other senior officers. The hearing was attended by senior functionaries of the state government, including the Chief Secretary, Shri Anurag Rastogi, Labour Commissioner, Shri Vijaykumar Bhavikatti and the District Magistrates (DMs) of all the districts.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The Supreme Court of India has issued several judgments and guidelines on bonded labor, including the landmark judgment in the case of Bishnu Sarma vs. State of Assam (2016), which emphasized the need for effective rehabilitation of bonded laborers.
Prelims Practice MCQs
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) heard how many cases of alleged bonded labour in Haryana brick kilns?
The NHRC heard 86 cases of alleged bonded labour in Haryana brick kilns. This was a virtual hearing held by the Commission.
Consider the following statements regarding NHRC Hearing on Bonded Labour in Haryana: 1. The NHRC heard 86 cases of alleged bonded labour in brick kilns across various districts of Haryana. 2. The hearing was attended by the Chief Secretary, Shri Anurag Rastogi, and the Labour Commissioner, Shri Vijaykumar Bhavikatti. 3. The Ministry of Labour and Employment issued a Standard Operating Procedure for Identification and Rescue of Bonded Labourers on 14th January 2026. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement-1 is correct because the text explicitly states that the NHRC heard 86 cases. Statement-2 is correct because the Chief Secretary and Labour Commissioner are mentioned as attending the hearing. However, Statement-3 is incorrect because the Standard Operating Procedure was issued on 14th May 2026, not January.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The NHRC heard 86 cases of alleged bonded labour in Haryana. Statement-II: The lack of proper examination of records by government functionaries led to the NHRC not having enough evidence to declare all labourers as bonded labourers. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-1 is supported by the text, which mentions that the NHRC heard 86 cases. Statement-2 explains why the NHRC did not have enough evidence to declare all labourers as bonded labourers, which is also supported by the text.