Calcutta High Court defers Abhishek Banerjee’s plea for protection in multiple FIRs till July 30
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Mains Practice Question
Discuss the implications of a High Court order being allegedly violated by Mamata Banerjee's Martyrs' Day rally.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
An FIR was filed over which event?
Mamata Banerjee organized a Martyrs' Day rally, for which an FIR was filed over alleged violation of a High Court order.
Consider the following statements regarding FIR filed over Mamata Banerjee's Martyrs' Day rally: 1. Mamata Banerjee organized a Martyrs' Day rally and an FIR was filed against her. 2. The Calcutta High Court ordered the police to file an FIR against Abhishek Banerjee. 3. Abhishek Banerjee's plea for protection in multiple FIRs is pending till August 1. How many of the above statements are correct?
The fact list supports that Mamata Banerjee organized a Martyrs' Day rally and an FIR was filed against her. However, the Calcutta High Court deferred Abhishek Banerjee's plea for protection in multiple FIRs till July 30, not August 1.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: An FIR was filed over Mamata Banerjee's Martyrs' Day rally for alleged violation of High Court order. Statement-II: The Calcutta High Court deferred Abhishek Banerjee's plea for protection in multiple FIRs till July 30. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-I is supported by the fact list, which states that an FIR was filed over Mamata Banerjee's Martyrs' Day rally for alleged violation of High Court order. Statement-II is also supported by the fact list, but it does not explain why Statement-I is true.