The Union Cabinet has decided to set up a bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in Ladakh to enhance access to justice for citizens in the region. This decision is part of the Government's commitment to the all-round development of Ladakh and ensuring constitutional safeguards. The move aims to reduce the time required for citizens to access legal services.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The Ladakh region has been a focus area for the Government's development initiatives, with several schemes and projects aimed at improving the infrastructure, healthcare, and education facilities in the region.
Prelims Practice MCQs
A bench of which High Court has been set up in Ladakh?
The Union Cabinet has decided to set up a bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in Ladakh.
Consider the following statements regarding Setting up a bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in Ladakh: 1. The Union Cabinet has decided to set up a bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in Ladakh. 2. The setting up of a bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in Ladakh will reduce the time required to avail legal services by 50%. 3. The Government is committed to ensuring constitutional safeguards in Ladakh. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is correct because it is directly supported by Fact 1. Statement 2 is incorrect because there is no information in the fact list to support the claim that the setting up of a bench will reduce the time required to avail legal services by 50%. Statement 3 is correct because it is directly supported by Fact 3.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The Union Cabinet has decided to set up a bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in Ladakh. Statement-II: The decision was taken under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to enhance access to justice for citizens living in remote areas of Ladakh. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is correct because it is directly supported by Fact 1. Statement 2 is correct and explains why Statement 1 is true because it mentions that the decision was taken to enhance access to justice, which is a provision mentioned in Fact 2.