The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) busted a syndicate of wildlife traffickers and seized 54 intricately carved ivory artefacts. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, prohibits trade and commerce in elephant ivory and articles manufactured therefrom. The DRI had previously seized ivory items in various operations in July and May.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Prelims Practice MCQs
How many intricately carved ivory artefacts were seized by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI)?
The DRI seized 54 intricately carved ivory artefacts as part of a crackdown on wildlife trafficking.
Consider the following statements regarding DRI's Wildlife Trafficking Busts: 1. The DRI had busted a syndicate in Mysuru, Karnataka in July and had seized 4 kg of elephant tusks. 2. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, prohibits trade and commerce in elephant ivory and articles manufactured therefrom. 3. The DRI had busted a syndicate in Sujangarh, Rajasthan in May and had seized 11 kg elephant ivory tusks. How many of the above statements are correct?
The DRI had busted a syndicate in Mysuru, Karnataka in May (not July) and had seized 4 kg of elephant tusks. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, prohibits trade and commerce in elephant ivory and articles manufactured therefrom.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The DRI had busted a syndicate in Mysuru, Karnataka in May and had seized 4 kg of elephant tusks. Statement-II: The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, prohibits trade and commerce in elephant ivory and articles manufactured therefrom. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
The fact that the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, prohibits trade and commerce in elephant ivory and articles manufactured therefrom explains why the DRI had busted a syndicate in Mysuru, Karnataka in May and had seized 4 kg of elephant tusks.