“After a brief pause in the ongoing conflict in the region, there has been a worrying resumption of attacks and escalation of hostilities. This is deeply concerning, and India calls for an immediate de-escalation of tensions,” says Permanent Representative of India to the UN Ambassador
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Mains Practice Question
Discuss the implications of India's Permanent Representative to the UN, who is Ambassador, on its diplomatic efforts in international forums.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
India has a Permanent Representative to the UN, who is Ambassador. Who holds this position?
The Permanent Representative to the UN is a key position that represents India's interests in international forums, and is currently held by an Ambassador.
What is the specific event or incident that prompted India's strong condemnation at the UNSC?
India's strong condemnation at the UNSC was specifically in response to recent maritime vessel attacks in the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting the need for regional security cooperation.
Consider the following statements regarding India's Representation in UNSC: 1. India has a Permanent Representative to the UN who is an Ambassador. 2. The Permanent Representative of India to the UN is also the Foreign Minister of India. 3. The conflict in the region has resumed after a brief pause. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is correct because fact 1 states that India has a Permanent Representative to the UN who is an Ambassador. Statement 2 is incorrect because there is no information about the Foreign Minister of India also being the Permanent Representative. Statement 3 is correct because fact 2 mentions that the conflict in the region has resumed after a brief pause.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: India has strongly condemned recent attacks on maritime vessels in Strait of Hormuz. Statement-II: The conflict in the region has resumed after a brief pause. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is true because India's Permanent Representative to the UN can issue strong condemnations. Statement 2 is true, but it does not explain why India condemned the attacks, so s2_explains_s1 is false.