In a series of intelligence-driven pan-India operations against illegal wildlife trafficking, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has seized 440 endangered/protected wild life animals and about 15 kg in ivory articles and elephant ivory in coordinated operations across country; and arrested 33 persons involved in wildlife trafficking. On 10.07.26, officers of DRI intercepted persons engaged in the illegal trade of elephant ivory near Sujangarh, Rajasthan. The operation resulted in the recovery and seizure of about 11 kg elephant ivory .
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, a landmark legislation aimed at protecting endangered species in India.
Prelims Practice MCQs
How many endangered/protected wildlife animals were seized by DRI in the operations?
The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) seized 440 endangered/protected wildlife animals in the operations.
Consider the following statements regarding Wildlife Trafficking Operations by DRI: 1. DRI has seized over 1,000 endangered animals in its operations. 2. The DRI operation at Sujangarh, Rajasthan resulted in the recovery of about 11 kg elephant ivory and the apprehension of four persons. 3. In a joint operation with CBI, DRI busted an interstate wildlife trafficking syndicate at multiple locations across Maharashtra and West Bengal. How many of the above statements are correct?
The first statement is false because the text mentions that 440 endangered/protected wild life animals were seized, but it does not specify a number over 1,000. The second statement is true as per the operation details at Sujangarh, Rajasthan. The third statement is true as it describes the joint operation with CBI.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The Indian elephant is listed under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Statement-II: This means that commercial trade in elephant derivatives, including ivory, is prohibited in India. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
The source explicitly states that the Indian elephant is listed under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. This classification prohibits trade in elephants and their derivatives, including ivory. Therefore, Statement-2 provides a correct causal explanation for why Statement-1 is true.