Various individuals and organisations representing Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes communities in the State expressed deep disappointment with the Karnataka High Court verdict that struck down the enhanced reservation
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The Supreme Court has previously upheld the 50% ceiling for reservation in government jobs and educational institutions in the landmark judgment of Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India (1992).
Prelims Practice MCQs
Which Act was enacted in 1989 to prevent atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes?
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is a law that aims to prevent atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
Consider the following statements regarding Karnataka High Court Verdict: 1. The Karnataka High Court verdict struck down the enhanced reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. 2. The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment is responsible for implementing the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 3. The Karnataka High Court verdict was influenced by the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is correct as per fact 1. Statement 2 is incorrect as the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment is responsible for implementing reservation policies, not the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Statement 3 is incorrect as there is no causal link between the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Karnataka High Court verdict.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The Karnataka High Court verdict struck down the enhanced reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Statement-II: The verdict was influenced by the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is correct as per fact 1. Statement 2 is incorrect as there is no causal link between the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Karnataka High Court verdict.