Cyclone Arnab interacted with a low-pressure system near Tamil Nadu, which the IMD overlooked in its updates. The low-pressure system was tracked by independent weather analysis platforms such as Windy.com and Zoom Earth. The interaction between the two systems led to heavy rains and gusty winds across Odisha and Andhra Pradesh.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Prelims Practice MCQs
What was the status of Cyclone Arnab on the evening of October 28?
Cyclone Arnab merged with another cyclonic system on the evening of October 28, as per ECMWF data visualised on windy.com.
Consider the following statements regarding Cyclone Arnab's interaction with a low-pressure system: 1. The low-pressure system merged with Cyclone Arnab during the morning of October 28. 2. The India Meteorological Department (IMD) had indicated the persistence of a low-pressure area over the 'southwest Bay of Bengal and adjoining south coastal Tamil Nadu' in its October 29 press release. 3. Data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), as visualised on Windy.com, showed its interaction with Cyclone Arnab as late as 6 pm on October 27. How many of the above statements are correct?
The correct statements are: (1) The low-pressure system merged with Cyclone Arnab during the evening of October 28, not the morning. (2) The IMD had indicated the persistence of a low-pressure area over the 'southwest Bay of Bengal and adjoining south coastal Tamil Nadu' in its October 26 press release, not October 29. (3) Data from the ECMWF, as visualised on Windy.com, showed its interaction with Cyclone Arnab as late as 6 pm on October 28, not October 27.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: Cyclone Arnab made a prolonged landfall along the Andhra Pradesh coast in the early hours of October 26. Statement-II: The low-pressure area merged with Cyclone Arnab during the evening of October 28, according to ECMWF data visualised on windy.com. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is false because Cyclone Arnab made a prolonged landfall along the Andhra Pradesh coast in the early hours of October 28, not October 26. Statement 2 is true because it accurately describes the merger of the low-pressure system with Cyclone Arnab.