Apex court says it will examine particular incidents during which the police used pellet guns indiscriminately or arbitrarily in violation of the standard regulations mapping graded responses for crowd control
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The Supreme Court's decision to frame a comprehensive protocol on pellet gun use during protests is related to its previous judgment in Ishrat Jahan vs. Union of India (2017), which dealt with the use of pellet guns by security forces in Kashmir.
Mains Practice Question
Critically examine the implications of a graded police response on crowd control, particularly in exceptional circumstances.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
The use of pellet guns is part of which type of police response?
The use of pellet guns is part of a graded police response, which is employed in exceptional circumstances to manage crowds.
What will the Supreme Court examine during its review?
The Supreme Court will examine incidents where the police used pellet guns indiscriminately or arbitrarily, which is a violation of standard regulations.
What are some cases where the police are violating standard regulations?
The police are violating standard regulations in some cases, particularly when using pellet guns indiscriminately or arbitrarily.
Consider the following statements regarding Use of Pellet Guns by Police: 1. The Supreme Court has ordered an immediate ban on the use of pellet guns by police. 2. The use of pellet guns is part of a graded police response in exceptional circumstances. 3. The standard regulations mapping graded responses for crowd control are being followed by the police in all cases. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is incorrect because there is no mention of an immediate ban on pellet guns. Statement 2 is correct as it aligns with provision 2 from the fact list. Statement 3 is incorrect because provision 4 states that the standard regulations are being violated in some cases.