Move is intended to prevent commercial exploitation and misuse of judicial hearings; a July 24 interim order had barred the circulation of livestream proceedings on digital platforms, reversing principle of open justice, activists said
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Mains Practice Question
Critically examine the implications of a protocol to access livestream archives on the principle of open justice.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
The Supreme Court has mooted a protocol to access its livestream archives to prevent commercial exploitation and misuse of judicial hearings, related to which aspect?
The Supreme Court's protocol is aimed at preventing commercial exploitation, which refers to the unauthorized use of court proceedings for financial gain.
Activists said that the Supreme Court's decision reversed which principle?
The decision reversed the principle of open justice, a cornerstone of transparency in the judiciary.
Consider the following statements regarding Supreme Court Livestream Archives: 1. The Supreme Court has been livestreaming its proceedings since 2020. 2. A July 24 interim order barred the circulation of livestream proceedings on digital platforms. 3. The move to access livestream archives is intended to prevent commercial exploitation and misuse. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement-1 is false because there is no mention of a specific date for when the Supreme Court started livestreaming its proceedings. Statement-2 is correct because it accurately reflects the fact list's information about an interim order on July 24. Statement-3 is correct as it aligns with the intention behind the protocol to access livestream archives.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court has mooted a protocol to access its livestream archives. Statement-II: This move is intended to prevent commercial exploitation and misuse of judicial hearings. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-1 is correct because it directly reflects the fact list's information about the Supreme Court considering a protocol. Statement-2 explains why this protocol was considered, aligning with the intention mentioned in the fact list.