T. Asaf Ali, Director General of Prosecution, gives legal advice that there is no legal bar in proceeding against Gyanesh Kumar. The case pertains to the reported suicide of Malaysian Lee See Been, a former chief project officer of Kerala State Transport Project for reconstruction of M.C. Road
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Prelims Practice MCQs
Which of the following is the Chief Election Commissioner involved in an abetment to suicide case?
Gyanesh Kumar is the Chief Election Commissioner involved in an abetment to suicide case, related to the reported suicide of Lee See Been.
Consider the following statements regarding Legal Proceedings Against Public Officials: 1. There is no legal bar in proceeding against the Chief Election Commissioner. 2. The Kerala State Transport Project is related to the case of Lee See Been. 3. T. Asaf Ali, the Director General of Prosecution, is not involved in the case. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is true because the fact list states that there is no legal bar in proceeding against Gyanesh Kumar. Statement 2 is false because the fact list does not mention any connection between the Kerala State Transport Project and the case of Lee See Been. Statement 3 is true because the fact list does not mention T. Asaf Ali's involvement in the case.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The Kerala government has obtained a legal opinion to proceed against Gyanesh Kumar. Statement-II: The legal opinion is based on the fact that there is no legal bar in proceeding against Gyanesh Kumar, according to legal advice. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-I is true because the fact list states that there is no legal bar in proceeding against Gyanesh Kumar, according to legal advice. Statement-II is also true because it correctly explains the basis of the legal opinion.