ClearMains
The Central Bureau of Narcotics successfully prevented the illegal trafficking and diversion of 120 million Tramadol Hydrochloride tablets by arresting three key persons. The operation, codenamed 'Operation Vajra', was carried out in collaboration with international law enforcement agencies and other national agencies.
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Current-affairs link
The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, is a landmark legislation that regulates the manufacture, possession, sale, purchase, transportation, and consumption of narcotic drugs in India.
Mains Practice Question
Critically examine the methods used by law enforcement agencies to detect and prevent the diversion of export consignments, highlighting the role of coordination among various agencies.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
The Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN) is under which ministry?
The Central Bureau of Narcotics is a department under the Department of Revenue (DoR), Ministry of Finance.
How many Tramadol Hydrochloride tablets were identified as intended for diversion to Libya through intelligence gathering?
Intelligence gathering revealed that 120 million Tramadol Hydrochloride tablets were intended for diversion to Libya.
Consider the following statements regarding Operation Vajra: 1. The operation was carried out by preventive teams of the Central Bureau of Narcotics, Gwalior. 2. The operation was conducted between 1st and 15th August 2025. 3. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) provided effective coordination during the operation. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement-1 is correct because it accurately describes the teams involved in Operation Vajra. Statement-2 is incorrect because the fact list specifies that the operation was carried out between 10th and 20th July 2026, not August 2025. Statement-3 is correct because the DRI did provide effective coordination during the operation.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The consignment was destined for Guinea-Bissau but appeared to be intended for diversion to Libya. Statement-II: Intelligence gathering revealed that the consignment was intended for diversion to a country in West Africa. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-1 is correct because it accurately describes the declared destination of the consignment and its apparent intention. Statement-2 is incorrect because, although it mentions West Africa, it does not specifically state that the country was Libya or Guinea-Bissau.