ClearMains
1971 legislation to be amended; Lok Sabha to take up Bill to increase number of Supreme Court judges
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Mains Practice Question
Discuss the implications of making insult to Vande Mataram a criminal offence, and examine the rationale behind amending the relevant legislation.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
The Government is to move a Bill in which house today to make insult to Vande Mataram a criminal offence?
The Government is moving a Bill in Rajya Sabha today to make insult to Vande Mataram a criminal offence, as part of efforts to strengthen national sentiment.
What legislation is proposed to be amended by the new Bill?
The 1971 legislation is to be amended by the proposed Bill, in order to make insult to Vande Mataram a criminal offence.
Which other legislative proposal is scheduled for consideration by Lok Sabha at the same time?
Lok Sabha is scheduled to consider a Bill to increase the number of Supreme Court judges at the same time as the Bill on Vande Mataram, highlighting the Parliament's legislative priorities.
Consider the following statements regarding Rajya Sabha Bill: 1. The Government is moving a Bill in Rajya Sabha today to make insult to Vande Mataram a criminal offence. 2. The proposed Bill aims to increase the number of Supreme Court judges. 3. The 1971 legislation will be amended by the proposed Bill. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement 1 is correct because it directly corresponds with Fact 1. Statement 2 is incorrect because it contradicts Fact 3, which mentions a separate Bill for increasing Supreme Court judges in Lok Sabha. Statement 3 is correct because it aligns with Fact 2.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The Government is moving a Bill in Rajya Sabha today to make insult to Vande Mataram a criminal offence. Statement-II: The proposed Bill aims to amend the 1971 legislation. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement 1 is correct because it directly corresponds with Fact 1. Statement 2 is also correct and explains why Statement 1 is true, as the proposed Bill indeed aims to amend the 1971 legislation (Fact 2).