2022 Khargone communal violence: 11 accused acquitted by court as prosecution case collapses. (See the linked source for details.)
Quick Revision
Prelims-testable facts
Trap alerts
Mains Practice Question
Critically examine the implications of a collapsed prosecution case on the justice system and community relations during communal violence.
250 words
Practice this in the exam hall →Prelims Practice MCQs
The National Investigation Agency investigated which case?
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is a central agency responsible for investigating terrorist cases, and it investigated the 2022 Khargone communal violence case.
How many accused were acquitted by a court in the 2022 Khargone communal violence case?
The court acquitted 11 accused in the case, marking a significant development in the investigation.
What happened to the prosecution case in the 2022 Khargone communal violence case?
The prosecution case in the 2022 Khargone communal violence case collapsed, marking a significant setback for the investigation.
Consider the following statements regarding Khargone communal violence case investigation: 1. The National Human Rights Commission investigated the Khargone communal violence case. 2. 11 accused were acquitted by a court in the Khargone communal violence case. 3. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigated the 2022 Khargone communal violence case. How many of the above statements are correct?
Statement-1 is incorrect because the fact list states that The National Investigation Agency (NIA) investigated the case. Statement-2 is correct as per the fact list. Statement-3 is incorrect because it contradicts statement-1 which mentions NIA.
Consider the following two statements: Statement-I: The prosecution case in the Khargone communal violence case collapsed. Statement-II: This was due to lack of evidence and poor investigation by The National Investigation Agency (NIA). Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Statement-1 is correct as per the fact list. Statement-2 is incorrect because it provides a reason which is not supported by any information in the fact list.